http://www.spookyhill.net/2006/05/29/links-for-2006-05-29/ Spookyhill's Own Weblog Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:16:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 http://www.spookyhill.net/2006/05/29/links-for-2006-05-29/#comment-947 Norm Gall Fri, 02 Jun 2006 21:43:26 +0000 http://www.spookyhill.net/2006/05/29/links-for-2006-05-29/#comment-947 I think that the attitude is, as you say, religiously motivated. We have the same sort of thinking in some fundamentalist Islamic thought: that the mere sight of bare female skin is sexually arousing; <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12857161/" rel="nofollow">even for other women</a>. I think that the attitude is, as you say, religiously motivated. We have the same sort of thinking in some fundamentalist Islamic thought: that the mere sight of bare female skin is sexually arousing; even for other women.

]]> http://www.spookyhill.net/2006/05/29/links-for-2006-05-29/#comment-822 Brandon Mon, 29 May 2006 14:57:36 +0000 http://www.spookyhill.net/2006/05/29/links-for-2006-05-29/#comment-822 I've never understood why we have such a negative reaction to harmless nudity in this part of the world. I blame it all on the Church. The "method" of advertising seems quite odd, but frankly I don't think people need to be freaking out about non-sexual nudity. I’ve never understood why we have such a negative reaction to harmless nudity in this part of the world. I blame it all on the Church. The “method” of advertising seems quite odd, but frankly I don’t think people need to be freaking out about non-sexual nudity.

]]>